<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikipedia entry for Online Community Manager</title>
	<atom:link href="http://conniebensen.com/2008/09/09/wikipedia-entry-for-online-community-manager/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://conniebensen.com/2008/09/09/wikipedia-entry-for-online-community-manager/</link>
	<description>Community Strategist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 05:30:36 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Connie Bensen</title>
		<link>http://conniebensen.com/2008/09/09/wikipedia-entry-for-online-community-manager/comment-page-1/#comment-1736</link>
		<dc:creator>Connie Bensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 03:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conniebensen.com/blog/2008/09/09/wikipedia-entry-for-online-community-manager/#comment-1736</guid>
		<description>Thanks Scott for the great help. It looks much better. I&#039;ll work on finding some more sources.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Scott for the great help. It looks much better. I&#8217;ll work on finding some more sources.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Germaise</title>
		<link>http://conniebensen.com/2008/09/09/wikipedia-entry-for-online-community-manager/comment-page-1/#comment-1735</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Germaise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 20:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conniebensen.com/blog/2008/09/09/wikipedia-entry-for-online-community-manager/#comment-1735</guid>
		<description>I dropped you an email to what I think is a correct address explaining my edits on your initial page. The article is likely just good enough now that it&#039;s arguably encyclopedic in nature. But it really could use some more independent, reliable references. It&#039;s also still unbalanced to the commercial side of the field. And JO is a bit overrepresented. Those kinds of things can bug the Wikipedia admin folks.

Anyway, hopefully other Wikipedians are also community folks, will see this post, and keep adding value to the entry.

Scott</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dropped you an email to what I think is a correct address explaining my edits on your initial page. The article is likely just good enough now that it&#8217;s arguably encyclopedic in nature. But it really could use some more independent, reliable references. It&#8217;s also still unbalanced to the commercial side of the field. And JO is a bit overrepresented. Those kinds of things can bug the Wikipedia admin folks.</p>
<p>Anyway, hopefully other Wikipedians are also community folks, will see this post, and keep adding value to the entry.</p>
<p>Scott</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

