<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s Your Personal Brand Worth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://conniebensen.com/2009/03/19/whats-your-personal-brand-worth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://conniebensen.com/2009/03/19/whats-your-personal-brand-worth/</link>
	<description>Community Strategist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 05:30:36 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob Enslin</title>
		<link>http://conniebensen.com/2009/03/19/whats-your-personal-brand-worth/comment-page-1/#comment-2972</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Enslin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 08:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conniebensen.com/blog/2009/03/19/whats-your-personal-brand-worth/#comment-2972</guid>
		<description>Hi Connie, 

Great article and good to see personal brand equity being debated.

With SM and Online Communities now more common than ever personal brands becomes ever more important IMO. Building a personal brand within an organisation draws parallels with connectors within online networks - power network users who are the back bone (nodes) of networks do have network equity. So too are community managers in building their personal brand - they bridge company networks and so become key within an organisation.

&quot;My prediction is that the smart brands will value those with strong personal brands..&quot;
I agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Connie, </p>
<p>Great article and good to see personal brand equity being debated.</p>
<p>With SM and Online Communities now more common than ever personal brands becomes ever more important IMO. Building a personal brand within an organisation draws parallels with connectors within online networks &#8211; power network users who are the back bone (nodes) of networks do have network equity. So too are community managers in building their personal brand &#8211; they bridge company networks and so become key within an organisation.</p>
<p>&#8220;My prediction is that the smart brands will value those with strong personal brands..&#8221;<br />
I agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Gold</title>
		<link>http://conniebensen.com/2009/03/19/whats-your-personal-brand-worth/comment-page-1/#comment-2970</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Gold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 09:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conniebensen.com/blog/2009/03/19/whats-your-personal-brand-worth/#comment-2970</guid>
		<description>An interesting debate. If you take David Beckham as an example (I think even Americans know who he is??) When he started at Manchester Utd FC he was just a kid starting out.  He was a great player for MU but then married Posh Spice, played for England and became a great International football star and celebrity.

When he joins a new club they get a big benefit from his name which in turn sells shirts, tickets etc.  He of course gets a big pay packet but also, extends his personal brand accordingly hence he picks teams that also have a strong brand in their own market.

Taking it back to the &#039;real world&#039; I would suggest an employee who is getting very well known within his/her sector - as an employee - will become a target for headhunters.  Good people will build their personal brand with or without consent and this has been made a lot easier with the advent of social media.  The smart employer will encourage and benefit from this expertise and knowledge fully aware that at some point the relationship will change; they will either get promoted, contract for them (albeit fewer hours but more cost/value) or leave to a competitor.  Take the Google/AOL sales scenario at the moment.

Share prices are impacted by the brand equity the new CFO or CEO has.  Staff motivation is affected when a new manager starts - their reputation often goes before them.  Personal brand equity has existed for a long time, it&#039;s just easier now to see it but maybe no closer to being measured!

Great post as ever Connie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting debate. If you take David Beckham as an example (I think even Americans know who he is??) When he started at Manchester Utd FC he was just a kid starting out.  He was a great player for MU but then married Posh Spice, played for England and became a great International football star and celebrity.</p>
<p>When he joins a new club they get a big benefit from his name which in turn sells shirts, tickets etc.  He of course gets a big pay packet but also, extends his personal brand accordingly hence he picks teams that also have a strong brand in their own market.</p>
<p>Taking it back to the &#8216;real world&#8217; I would suggest an employee who is getting very well known within his/her sector &#8211; as an employee &#8211; will become a target for headhunters.  Good people will build their personal brand with or without consent and this has been made a lot easier with the advent of social media.  The smart employer will encourage and benefit from this expertise and knowledge fully aware that at some point the relationship will change; they will either get promoted, contract for them (albeit fewer hours but more cost/value) or leave to a competitor.  Take the Google/AOL sales scenario at the moment.</p>
<p>Share prices are impacted by the brand equity the new CFO or CEO has.  Staff motivation is affected when a new manager starts &#8211; their reputation often goes before them.  Personal brand equity has existed for a long time, it&#8217;s just easier now to see it but maybe no closer to being measured!</p>
<p>Great post as ever Connie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Schawbel</title>
		<link>http://conniebensen.com/2009/03/19/whats-your-personal-brand-worth/comment-page-1/#comment-2968</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Schawbel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 05:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conniebensen.com/blog/2009/03/19/whats-your-personal-brand-worth/#comment-2968</guid>
		<description>When it comes to being a personal brand within a corporate brand and in charge of the corporate social media assets, you need to build the corporate equity.  You shouldn&#039;t be using your twitter account as the corporate twitter account.  Instead, you should have a corporate twitter account and focus on building that asset because when you leave, the company still benefits.  It wouldn&#039;t be fair otherwise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to being a personal brand within a corporate brand and in charge of the corporate social media assets, you need to build the corporate equity.  You shouldn&#8217;t be using your twitter account as the corporate twitter account.  Instead, you should have a corporate twitter account and focus on building that asset because when you leave, the company still benefits.  It wouldn&#8217;t be fair otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

