Comm in Enterprise

Wave Report Showcases Community Platforms

The much anticipated Forrester Wave Report was released today. Jeremiah Owyang has invested much time in gathering, evaluating & reporting on companies that offer community platforms.

image

I appreciate that the focus was on more than just technology. Building a community requires a strategy combined with an integration of resources (including people!).

… applied over 60% of our weighted criteria based on what our clients tell us they want, a solutions partner that delivers strategy, education, services, community management, analytics and support.

Nine companies were chosen for the Wave Report. They are Jive Software, Telligent Systems, KickApps, Pluck, Awareness, Lithium Technologies, Mzinga, LiveWorld & Leverage Software.

Over the past year I’ve gotten to know people from these companies. How? Many of them are providing great resources.

Lithium has some great whitepapers. And Scott Dodds commented on my blog enough times so that I sought him out in person at Defrag & we had a great chat!

Awareness offers great webinars & whitepapers! Check out their archive of webinars . Dave Carter, CTO has been a great friend & mentor. He gave me insight into the vendor’s side of this process. Robin Hopper is another great resource there.

I met Mzinga folks at the Social Media Strategies & DeFrag conferences. I have their book here. And I met Mike Walsh from Leverage at Social Media Strategies conference too. Lawrence Liu of Telligent & I had a great chat at DeFrag! (His intensity reminded me of Jeremiah’s!). And George Dearing, also from Telligent & I have crossed paths online.

And last but certainly not least, I’ve had the good fortune to get to know Bryan Person, Community Evangelist, for Live World. In my opinion every community platform company should have one – so take note guys! Bryan is doing a great job of defining that role.

Tom Humbarger had asked if these companies are – Walking the “Social Media Walk”.? I spent time outlining all of the ways that these companies are contributing to establishing community best practices. I’m a huge proponent of education & many of these companies are contributing to the conversations in addition to participating on social networking sites.

Thanks to these companies for setting the bar for community building & I look forward to your contributions in 2009!

(I’ll let each company link to their resources in the comments & I’ll put them in the post. Thanks!)

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Nattergalen offers Community Management

As companies consider how to add a community manager to their repertoire, Nattergalen offers a unique option. I had the opportunity to speak with Marguerite Jussuf, COO & Scott Hammond, VP of Biz Dev’t about their company & philosophy. I was intrigued because I’ve seen them posting in areas where I frequent.

image

Nattergalen offers community management services. That sounds simple enough, but it brought so many questions to mind. They also offer tech solutions for setting up white label platforms so that they’re branded for the customer & personalized. But it was the people solutions that we spent the most time talking about.

Marguerite & Scott are very excited about their young company & their aspirations. They started it in April 2008 & it’s growing steadily. They offer community planning & the high level skills of ongoing community management. Their customer is able to have the benefit of a community manager without having it as an in-house position. The position is provided on a remote basis but with much planning & support before the implementation of the position. Our conversation came back to the pro’s & con’s of ‘working remotely’ a few times.

I asked them about their philosophy of dealing with communities & I was quite pleased to hear that we share many of the same ideas. Whenever I see ’services’, I have a concern – what are the standards? We had a nice discussion about standards for this emerging profession. Scott had an excellent point that companies are being really trusting when they allow a community manager to serve as the voice for their brand. It’s an incredible responsibility & requires considerable trust.

The one thing that I wonder about when I read about ‘people services’ is if it’s moderation or providing the full spectrum of services. Nattergalen offers the external role of community building as an additional option – Marketing 2.0 services. In my opinion I think that that’s a key piece to grow the community & be a part of the extended community. It’s a time for the community manager to connect with others in the niche, share ideas, learn and promote the brand & community. I think that companies should definitely consider it a necessity.

It was great to hear Scott & Marguerite’s passion in regard to community building & for providing exceptional service to their customers. I look forward to watching their company grow!

For further reading, I have specific information on the community manager role.

What questions do you have for Marguerite & Scott? I’m sure that they’ll be glad to answer them.


Building Community in the Enterprise

Yesterday’s webinar, Web 2.0 in the Enterprise, by Rob Koplowitz of Forrester was an excellent presentation that really got me thinking about the various aspects of building community inside the enterprise. Most of my focus has been external but the concepts of working efficiently, collaboration & building relationships applies to the internal aspects too.

Here’s an outline of the main points:

1. Knowledge workers – the next place for efficiency (email isn’t cutting it anymore & elegant web 2.0 solutions exist now that foster internal community building)

  • collaboration is being redefined (and it’s traumatic to some)
  • it’s about how people work & human activities
  • brands need to differentiate themselves & they can achieve that by drawing on their employee’s ideas

I like Forrester’s definition of Web 2.0:

A set of technologies & applications that enable efficient interaction among people, content, and data in support of collectively fostering new businesses, technology offerings, and social structures.

Rob made the point that the first part is the tactical aspect.And the underlined part is what’s causing the ruckus. Digital natives are ignoring IT & wanting to use collaboration tools, information sources & networking options that aren’t necessarily endorsed by the Enterprise. These solutions are relatively inexpensive or open source & the younger generation expects to work in a Web 2.0 environment. The good news is that these tools require little or no support from IT, so they easily be outsourced. Rob provided stat’s that over 50% of organizations are considering implementing collaboration strategies & 25% will be implementing Web 2.0 technology.

He gave an example of how Bell Canada creatively responded to the economic threat of Google. They utilized the long tail to stimulate idea generation from employees by creating an internal blog encouraging idea generation & then the ability to vote. The highest rated ideas & the lowest were championed by the executive level for subsequent strategic planning.

Blogs are a good way to gather ideas from staff internally & document information. Wiki’s are used for collaboration. The value of both is that they build brand inside the organization. They encourage organizational change. Once people get used to using the blog/wiki they enjoy contributing. Both provide a "corporate memory" that is invaluable. And Rob pointed out that new voices emerge from the organization. It puts email back to the purpose it was intended for.

The slide below highlights what Web 2.0 offers. Information becomes artifacts. Down on the bottom left is where IT needs to be involved in ensuring that policies, security & compliance are followed. This removes the risk & allows for more transparency because the purpose of the tool has been reviewed & approved.

image

How to go about implementing this?

  • Assume that the existing compliance, privacy, security & discovery procedures apply
  • The organization needs to assess authentication & security.
  • Decide on the levels of the policy

What’s appropriate considering the situation?

  • Internal versus external information
  • Public versus private systems
  • Trusted vs non-trusted info sources

Rob listed out things to look for:

  • Authentication model
  • Security model
  • Integration with search strategy
  • Policy management
  • Integration API’s

He wrapped up his presentation by encouraging the audience to find strategies that harness the new Web 2.0 tools. Building community internally can provide business value today.

I want to make a point that the tools/services are very reasonable for building community internally or externally. We just need to help organizations get over their fears & encourage them to start experimenting!

Please share your experiences. Someone sent me a note with their story & I’m going to interview him & share it with you.


Teens Using Social Media

Well, we knew that already! But if you want to get an overview of how Teens are using social media then the new PEW report on Teens & Social Media has some amazing facts. In November I wrote about Digital Natives in the Workplace which talked about how the stat’s below will shift the future.

93% of teens are online & 64% are creating content!

  • Girls are blogging more (35% compared to 20% of the boys)
  • Boys are more likely to watch & upload videos (21% vs 10%)
  • Digital images – almost 90% have posted photos or videos! & interact by commenting

For communication, the cell phone is the primary choice of 70%

  • 60% texting
  • 47% messages over social networks
  • 22% email (J. Owyang’s prediction that email is dying is showing)

(the reason that it is more than 100% is because teens use combinations of the above)

This quote is quite interesting in that mentorship is acknowledged as a key role. This phenomenon can be seen with any community no matter the age range.

MIT professor Henry Jenkins notes that, along with the rise in popularity of participatory media applications, there has also been a concurrent development of “participatory cultures” that serve to encourage all of this user-contributed content. Jenkins defines a participatory culture as “a culture with relatively low barriers to artistic expression and civic engagement, strong support for creating and sharing one’s creations, and some type of informal mentorship whereby what is known by the most experienced is passed along to novices.”

Take away -

Reading the report is like looking into the not too distant future. In next five years the use of social media & participation in networks are going to keep increasing at an exponential rate.


Copyright © 1996-2010 Connie Bensen. All rights reserved.
iDream theme by Templates Next | Customized by Solutions by Heidi